How Crypto's Biggest Bill Died: Inside the Clarity Act's Collapse
Months of negotiations, a massive lobbying campaign, and bipartisan energy — undone by ethics fights, a memecoin, and a midterm election.
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act was the crypto industry's top legislative prize: a market-structure bill meant to settle, once and for all, how the SEC and CFTC divide oversight of a roughly $3 trillion sector. Earlier this month it failed a key procedural vote on the Senate floor, and its future is now in limbo. Interviews with more than a dozen industry participants and legislative aides paint a picture of a bill-writing process undone from nearly every direction, according to CoinDesk's postmortem.
The core problem the bill aimed to fix is real. Crypto spot markets sit in a federal regulatory gray zone: the CFTC lacks spot-market authority beyond fraud and derivatives, the SEC never issued formal rulemakings for crypto securities products, and there's no explicit line marking where one agency's authority ends and the other's begins.
The memecoin problem
The dominant talking point throughout the bill's life was ethics — specifically, President Donald Trump's crypto ties. Democrats wanted to restrain senior officials, Trump first and foremost, from profiting off the sector. The Trump family's crypto ventures include World Liberty Financial, the $TRUMP memecoin, and mining firm American Bitcoin; Trump's June financial disclosure showed he made $1.4 billion from crypto ventures during his first year back in office, according to CoinDesk.
As far back as May 2025, Senator Ruben Gallego and eight other Democrats threatened to block the GENIUS Act over Trump's profiting, ultimately voting for it with marginal changes. By this year, the pressure had only intensified. Senator Kirsten Gillibrand said in May the Clarity Act wouldn't advance without an ethics provision. A late Republican ethics proposal and Democratic counteroffers never converged, and with an election six weeks away, even sympathetic Democrats voted against the procedural motion.
"My personal opinion … even though the failure of Clarity had multiple causes, I am convinced that if it were not for Donald Trump, we likely could have seen both Democrats and Republicans get to yes," Representative Ritchie Torres said at a CoinDesk policy event last week. "Once the president issued his personal memecoin, that created a political problem for Democrats."
A fight the industry helped start
The crypto industry's own conduct also drew scrutiny. In January, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong publicly withdrew support for the Senate Banking Committee's version over its treatment of stablecoin yield and rewards — kicking off a months-long battle between the crypto and banking industries. Ripple's chief legal officer Stu Alderoty said there was "an opportunity in January" to negotiate before the midterms closed in.
The Senate ignored the House's own Clarity Act — which passed 294-134 in July 2025 with 78 Democratic votes — and built its own version from scratch. Even if the Senate vote had succeeded, the House had adjourned and wouldn't have taken it up until the lame-duck session after the election.
"I think politics was very clearly elevated over policy," Alderoty told CoinDesk. "It was good policy, and the industry needs to get better at politics."
Written by the BidAsk Newsroom. Based on reporting from the sources below.
Is your VPN actually protecting you?
LeakCheck runs a free VPN leak test right in your browser — real WebRTC leak detection, your public IP and location, and a clear pass/fail verdict. No signup, no cost.
Test my VPN →Free tool run by the same publisher as BidAsk. No affiliate links.
